Grapes Of Wrath And Of Mice And Men: Character Study :: essays research papers

Grapes of fury and Of Mice and workforce Character Study     The American Novelist, conjuring trick Steinbeck was a powerful writer of dramaticstories about good versus bad. His clear views on writing were that not onlyshould a writer make the falsehood sound good but also the allegory pen shouldteach a lesson. In accompaniment, Steinbeck focused many another(prenominal) of his novels, not on averageliterary themes rather he tended to relay messages about the many knockout truths oflife in The United States. Upon winning the Nobel Peace look on in 1962 theSwedish academy introduced him by pronounceing "He had no mind to be an un pipendingcomforter and entertainer. Instead, the topics he chose were serious and denunciatory" This serious focus was not exempt from his two works "The Grapesof Wrath" and "Of Mice and Men". "The Grapes of Wrath" has been recognized bymany as "the great novel in American Hi written repor t" and it remains among thearchetypes of American culture. Although "Of Mice and Men" may not havereceived as much flashgun as the other it is still a great classic that waslately made into a motion picture.     The focus of "The Grapes of Wrath" Is one family, the Joads, who hasbeen kicked off their Oklahoma farm and forced to move to California to look forwork. The story has historical significance as it is true that many familieswere forced, in the kindred way as the Joads, to leave their homes to look forwork during the depression. It is in this fact that one can see how Steinbecksintention in "The grapes of Wrath" was to generate the hardships people wentthrough during an actual event in American history. by chance the most solemnmessage in this novel was the poor interference of the dispossessed families asthey reached California. In "Of Mice and Men" the reader is presented with astory that takes place in the same s etting of "The Grapes of Wrath" This story elaborate the hardships of two traveling companions while they be working at aranch in California.     The common thread between these two novels is not necessarily the plotor the setting rather, it is the way in which Steinbeck relays his message.That is to say that, although both novels carry different story lines they bothportray hard truths about human suffering. Steinbeck reveals these truthsthrough his depiction of characters. In each story it seems that the characterswere crafted by Steinbeck in a bias manner so as to emphasize the overallmessage of the book. It is quite obvious that all of Steinbecks characters are